Switzerland has been criticised by Amnesty International for a hardline stance against migrants entering via its southern border. Many migrants were prevented from applying for asylum, which the organisation says “violates Swiss law”.
This content was published on
3 minutes
swissinfo.ch/jd
The forced deportation of thousands of asylum seekers from Switzerland to Italy since the summer was flagged up in Amnesty’s report on the 2016 human rights situation globally. In particular it described facial discrimination against “people of colour or with North African features”, over-zealous Swiss border guards and the blocking of unaccompanied minors on the Swiss-Italian border.
“It is clear that the border control methods put in place by Swiss authorities prevent or dissuade people from entering into the country,” said Denise Graf, the asylum section head of the Swiss chapter of Amnesty International. Refusing migrants the right to apply for asylum in Switzerland “violates Swiss law”, she said.
More
More
Are the Swiss too strict about the Dublin accords?
This content was published on
Our data shows Switzerland’s strict application of the Dublin accords means migrants are sent to a country where they weren’t officially registered.
Switzerland previously said any individual requesting asylum would be granted the opportunity.
Although Switzerland is not one of the main destination countries for asylum seekers, between 2009 and 2014 it was the country that transferred the most migrants to another EU state. This practice is part of the Dublin accords, signed in 1990 and adopted by Switzerland in December 2008. According to this agreement, an asylum application can be made only once – as a rule, in the first country in which the migrant is registered. In most cases, this is Italy or Greece.
According to Amnesty International, thousands of migrants and refugees were sent back to Italy using “simplified” border procedures, which the human rights organisation qualified as illegal. There was a “lack of evaluation of the individual situations” that would result from a migrant’s return to Italy, should Italy then deport them to countries like Sudan, it said.
The situation is “even more serious” for unaccompanied minors on the Swiss border, whose vulnerability had not given due consideration. Dozens of minors with family in Switzerland had been sent back to Italy in 2016, Amnesty International said.
Last year Amnesty International demanded clarification from Swiss authorities over reports by children that they had been sent back when trying to join their parents there. The State Secretariat for Migration said at the time they expected any child attempting to join relatives in Switzerland would be delivered to the care of migration authorities.
A number of migrants are stranded in the Italian town of Como. None of the people questioned there by Amnesty had been informed of the process to follow for asylum in Switzerland
The southern Swiss canton of Ticino has been the main point of entry for many thousands of illegal arrivals, whose final destination is thought to be Germany or Scandinavia.
Within Switzerland, the Amnesty report repeated concerns raised in July by the national commission for the prevention of torture that the police had used “disproportionate force in certain cantons” while expelling migrants.
Popular Stories
More
Foreign affairs
What Trump’s return or a new Harris administration would mean for Switzerland
Should raw milk sales be banned or should consumers decide?
Swiss food regulations do not allow raw milk to be sold for direct consumption. However, a loophole allows 400 raw milk vending machines to do just that.
Is reforming the Swiss pension system still possible, and if so, how?
Solutions still need to be found to meet the challenge of an ageing population and to improve the pensions of low-paid workers, the majority of whom are women.
If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at english@swissinfo.ch.
Read more
More
Are the Swiss too strict about the Dublin accords?
This content was published on
Our data shows Switzerland’s strict application of the Dublin accords means migrants are sent to a country where they weren't officially registered.
This content was published on
In an interview with swissinfo.ch, Albert Rösti, a member of parliament and the newly minted president of the People’s Party, argued that proposals to accelerate asylum procedures and offer free legal advice would only encourage undeserving applicants to come to Switzerland. Instead, Rösti said, “we should be looking for solutions for rejecting or repatriating the…
This content was published on
Which countries are the most affected? What might happen if the EU adopts mandatory quotas for each member nation? The answers are contained in a series of graphics and interactives. Never before have so many people risked their lives to reach Europe by sea. In 2015 alone, over 432,000 migrants and refugees landed on the…
Switzerland’s defence of the Dublin accords is not a coincidence
This content was published on
Although Switzerland is not one of the main destination countries for asylum seekers, between 2009 and 2014 it was the country that transferred the most migrants to another EU state. This practice is part of the Dublin accords, signed in 1990 and adopted by Switzerland in December 2008. According to this agreement, an asylum application…
This content was published on
In July alone, 3,560 people who had made it across the border into TicinoExternal link, the Italian-speaking southern canton, were immediately sent back to Italy – more than the number of people for the whole first seven months of 2015. The Swiss Border GuardExternal link said on Wednesday that since the beginning of this year,…
Amnesty calls for more Swiss solidarity for migrants
This content was published on
Switzerland bore a particular responsibility, according to the human rights organisation, given that, although it is not one of the main destinations for asylum seekers, it is the country that transfers the most migrants to another EU state. This practice is part of the Dublin accords, adopted by non-EU Switzerland in 2008. According to this,…
This content was published on
Several hundred migrants have been sleeping near the train station in Como, Italy, since July after a Swiss clampdown on crossings. Guards on the Italian border turned away 4,149 people last month. Speaking on Thursday in Bern, Sommaruga noted that many migrants do not want to stay in Switzerland but plan to travel to northern…
You can find an overview of ongoing debates with our journalists here . Please join us!
If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at english@swissinfo.ch.