Swiss perspectives in 10 languages

UBS voluntarily terminates guarantee agreement with Swiss government

Picture of outside of UBS bank
On Friday UBS voluntarily terminated the loss guarantee agreement with the Swiss government and the Swiss National Bank (SNB). © Keystone / Michael Buholzer

The Swiss government and taxpayers will no longer bear any risks from guarantees made to preserve financial stability after the collapse of Credit Suisse.

On Friday UBS voluntarily terminated the loss guarantee agreement with the Swiss government and the Swiss National Bank (SNB).

The agreement will terminate with immediate effect, as UBS says it no longer need the CHF9 billion ($10.2 billion) guarantee. But the government said that it still intended to submit a bill to parliament to introduce a public liquidity backstop under ordinary law and is still conducting a comprehensive review of too-big-to-fail regulatory framework.

+ Credit Suisse bondholder litigation could cost taxpayer billions

The contract was officially signed on June 9, when the Swiss government earmarked CHF9 billion of taxpayer funds to plug potential losses arising from the UBS takeover of Credit Suisse.

These measures were created under an emergency law, to facilitate the takeover brokered by the government in March as Credit Suisse hurtled toward bankruptcy. Under the terms, UBS was to assume the first CHF5 billion of losses, with the government stepping up to take on the next CHF9 billion.

But, “all extraordinary liquidity assistance based on the emergency law of March 19 has been repaid”, UBS said in a statement. Credit Suisse has also fully repaid the loans of CHF50 billion to the SNB as of August 10, the bank continues.

+UBS to dispose of risky Credit Suisse loans to Asian clients

The finance ministry added that the guarantees have not resulted in any losses for the government, but rather brought around CHF200 million in revenues.

In total, UBS paid some CHF730 million in commitment fees and risk premiums to Swiss authorities, made up of CHF200 million to the government and CHF530 million to the SNB. 

+Swiss investors in Credit Suisse join class action challenging UBS deal

Political reaction

Swiss Finance Minister Karin Keller-Sutter said she was pleased with UBS’s decision, as she wanted “to get rid of this guarantee quickly”. 

After emphasising that the government “had not spent a single franc”, she praised UBS as a “strong partner”.

However, she had a harsher judgement for the Credit Suisse management. “We’ve been up all night because a bank didn’t take responsibility for itself, for its employees, for its clients, but also for Switzerland. We got into this situation because a bank had obviously made the wrong decisions over the years.”

Keller-Sutter explained that had UBS not rescued the Swiss bank, individuals as well as companies would have been damaged. “We would have produced major distortions in Switzerland.”

‘Swift and decisive’

Most political parties reacted with relief to the news, but while the Radical-Liberals and the Liberal Greens praised the stabilisation of the banking system, the Swiss People’s Party and the Green Party questioned the procedure chosen last March. 

The Radical-Liberals praised the “swift and decisive action of the Federal Council” and criticised the Swiss People’s Party’s “irresponsible political theatre”. Similarly, the Liberal Greens added that the politics of indignation from “the left and right” was “exaggerated and short-sighted. Now the new UBS has been stabilised and taxpayers will not be burdened”.

The People’s Party defended its rejection of the loan in parliament. “As suspected, the financial situation of Credit Suisse was obviously far better in March 2023 than it had been presented.” It regretted that “overtaxed [financial watchdog] FINMA and a despondent Federal Council did not ensure that Switzerland would retain two big banks”.

Finally, the Greens said there were still “massive financial risks for taxpayers”, which should be minimised within the framework of the revision of the “Too Big To Fail” regulation.

Popular Stories

Most Discussed

News

No Swiss bank in phase with environmental objectives

More

Swiss banks failing environment, says WWF

This content was published on None of the 15 major Swiss retail banks is meeting international climate and biodiversity targets, according to a ranking by WWF Switzerland.

Read more: Swiss banks failing environment, says WWF
UNRWA provides emergency assistance to just over one million Palestine refugees, or about 75 per cent of all Palestine refugees in Gaza, who lack the financial means to cover their basic food.

More

Lazzarini: no alternative to UNRWA in Gaza

This content was published on The only alternative to the UN Palestinian agency’s work in Gaza is to allow Israel to run services there, Philippe Lazzarini, UNRWA Commissioner-General, told reporters in Geneva on Monday.

Read more: Lazzarini: no alternative to UNRWA in Gaza

In compliance with the JTI standards

More: SWI swissinfo.ch certified by the Journalism Trust Initiative

You can find an overview of ongoing debates with our journalists here . Please join us!

If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at english@swissinfo.ch.

SWI swissinfo.ch - a branch of Swiss Broadcasting Corporation SRG SSR

SWI swissinfo.ch - a branch of Swiss Broadcasting Corporation SRG SSR