Voters in Iceland resisted radical change in last weekend’s parliamentary election. Boosting citizen participation could show the way ahead for a parliament that is more diverse than ever.
This content was published on
2 minutes
Bruno Kaufmann in Reykjavík, Urs Geiser, swissinfo.ch
Bruno Kaufmann, correspondent for northern Europe at the public Swiss Broadcasting Corporation, and international expert on direct democracy, says Iceland has gone through turbulent times over the past decade.
In a seeming paradox of rapid change and resistance, Iceland’s citizens cling to old traditions while embracing progressive reforms.
In an article for the democracy platform people2powerExternal link, Kaufmann retraces the struggle for a new national constitution up to the parliamentary elections held on October 29, 2016.
The incumbent centre-right Independence Party Now and its coalition partner, the Progressive Party, has now won 29 of 63 seats in parliament.
Pro EU party
But it is the newly formed Regeneration Party which holds the key to forming the next government.
This pro-European group wants a nationwide vote notably on whether Iceland should resume talks with Brussels on membership in the 28-nation bloc.
The last government in Reykjavík had suspended negotiations without consulting voters first, breaking an election campaign promise.
Iceland, an island nation halfway between Norway and Greenland with a population of about 330,000 people, may be known for its natural beauty and for its volcanos.
But did you know that a volcanic eruption is understood to be one to the triggering events of the 18th century French Revolution, and therefore, the birth of modern representative democracy in Europe?
If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at english@swissinfo.ch.
Read more
More
Hungary’s government makes use of democracy rights
This content was published on
“The ruling elite has colonised direct democracy and exploits it for its own purposes,” says Zoltán Tibor PállingerExternal link, a Swiss-Hungarian political scientist from Budapest’s Andrássy University. The referendum, a key tool of citizens’ participation in politics, became increasingly important after Hungary’s peaceful revolution in 1989. Votes took place about Hungary’s membership of the EU…
This content was published on
With a vote on the complex bailout terms in Greece this weekend, Europe and the world once again has to revisit its suboptimal handling of modern direct democracy.
This content was published on
However, he argues that the form of a top-down plebiscite Brexit-style referendum, chosen by British government, is not the right way to go about it. Kaufmann says Britain’s parliamentary democracy and its “winner takes it all” system has been struggling for decades to represent the interests of the nearly 65 million residents in the UK.…
This content was published on
It takes more than just a perspective of the next 50 days to be able to see a silver lining on the dark horizons of Europe. On June 23, almost 50 million British citizens will be asked if they would like their country to ‘stay in’ or ‘leave’ the EU. As usual, a fair share…
You can find an overview of ongoing debates with our journalists here . Please join us!
If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at english@swissinfo.ch.