Court finds Switzerland guilty of violating refugees’ right to family life
The Strasbourg-based Court ruled that Switzerland had violated Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, concerning the right to respect for private and family life
Keystone / Patrick Seeger
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has criticised Switzerland for rejecting refugees’ applications for family reunification on the grounds that they were dependent on social assistance.
This content was published on
2 minutes
Keystone-SDA/ts
Español
es
El Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos declara a Suiza culpable
In its rulingExternal link handed down on Tuesday, the Strasbourg-based Court found that Switzerland had violated Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, concerning the right to respect for private and family life. The four people – three Eritreans and one Chinese of Tibetan origin – arrived in Switzerland between 2008 and 2012 and were granted refugee status.
They were admitted to the country on a provisional basis, as it had been established that they would be at risk of ill-treatment if returned to their country of origin. Unlike refugees with asylum status, provisionally admitted people are only entitled to family reunification if they are not reliant on social assistance.
In the case of the four refugees, the Swiss authorities refused their applications for family reunification on the grounds that this condition was not met.
More
More
European court opposes Swiss deportation of Afghan refugee
This content was published on
An Afghan Christian who fled to Switzerland but was denied asylum should not be sent back to his home country, a European court has ruled.
Noting that two of the four applicants were working and that a third had been declared medically unfit for work, the Court found that the Swiss authorities “had not struck a fair balance between, on the one hand, the applicants’ interest in being reunited with their immediate family members in Switzerland, and on the other hand, the interest of the community as a whole in controlling immigration with a view to protecting the economic well-being of the country”.
The ECHR ordered Switzerland to pay €5,125 (CHF5,000) each to two applicants and €15,375 (CHF15,000) to a third for non-pecuniary damage, as well as costs and expenses.
In the case of a fourth applicant, the Court found that the authorities had not exceeded their discretionary power in rejecting the applicant’s request for family reunification. She had made no effort to find a job, although she was able to work.
The European Court of Human Rights is an international court of the Council of Europe which interprets the European Convention on Human Rights. It is not connected to the European Union.
Swiss parliament calls for deeper EU security cooperation
This content was published on
The House of Representatives has called on the Swiss government to take a more proactive approach to European security policy.
Switzerland has no US-style fentanyl problem, says health minister
This content was published on
There is very little chance of a US-sized fentanyl epidemic in Switzerland, says health minister Elisabeth Baume-Schneider.
This content was published on
Two fish species recently discovered in Switzerland have been called fluvicola and ommata, following an appeal to the public for names.
Convicted ex-shipowner achieves partial success in Swiss court
This content was published on
The Federal Supreme Court orders lower court to reassess part of its verdict against former Swiss shipowner Hans-Jürg Grunder.
This content was published on
A Swiss moratorium on the genetic engineering of plants, which expires at the end of 2025, could be extended for five years.
SWISS airline achieves second-best profit in history
This content was published on
Revenues soared for Swiss International Air Lines in 2024, contributing to the second-largest profit in the company's history.
Court finds Switzerland violated Sudanese man’s rights
This content was published on
In its verdict published on Tuesday, the Strasbourg-based court held that Switzerland’s decision to send the Sudanese national back home had violated articles two and three of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protect the right to life and prohibit torture and “inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment”. The Sudanese man has been a…
Switzerland criticised by Strasbourg court for judge’s lack of impartiality
This content was published on
The European Court of Human Rights has upheld an appeal by Erwin Sperisen, who had complained that the Geneva Appeals Court president was biased.
You can find an overview of ongoing debates with our journalists here . Please join us!
If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at english@swissinfo.ch.