Court finds Switzerland guilty of violating refugees’ right to family life
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has criticised Switzerland for rejecting refugees’ applications for family reunification on the grounds that they were dependent on social assistance.
This content was published on
2 minutes
Keystone-SDA/ts
Español
es
El Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos declara a Suiza culpable
In its rulingExternal link handed down on Tuesday, the Strasbourg-based Court found that Switzerland had violated Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, concerning the right to respect for private and family life. The four people – three Eritreans and one Chinese of Tibetan origin – arrived in Switzerland between 2008 and 2012 and were granted refugee status.
They were admitted to the country on a provisional basis, as it had been established that they would be at risk of ill-treatment if returned to their country of origin. Unlike refugees with asylum status, provisionally admitted people are only entitled to family reunification if they are not reliant on social assistance.
In the case of the four refugees, the Swiss authorities refused their applications for family reunification on the grounds that this condition was not met.
More
More
European court opposes Swiss deportation of Afghan refugee
This content was published on
An Afghan Christian who fled to Switzerland but was denied asylum should not be sent back to his home country, a European court has ruled.
Noting that two of the four applicants were working and that a third had been declared medically unfit for work, the Court found that the Swiss authorities “had not struck a fair balance between, on the one hand, the applicants’ interest in being reunited with their immediate family members in Switzerland, and on the other hand, the interest of the community as a whole in controlling immigration with a view to protecting the economic well-being of the country”.
The ECHR ordered Switzerland to pay €5,125 (CHF5,000) each to two applicants and €15,375 (CHF15,000) to a third for non-pecuniary damage, as well as costs and expenses.
In the case of a fourth applicant, the Court found that the authorities had not exceeded their discretionary power in rejecting the applicant’s request for family reunification. She had made no effort to find a job, although she was able to work.
The European Court of Human Rights is an international court of the Council of Europe which interprets the European Convention on Human Rights. It is not connected to the European Union.
Most Read Swiss Abroad
More
Gold-digging: why some Swiss bury their wealth in the garden
Swiss cantons have killed 39 wolves so far this autumn
This content was published on
In mid-November, 35 packs of three or more wolves were detected in Switzerland. At least eight of them may be eliminated during the current hunting season. So far, at least 39 wolves have been shot in Graubünden, Valais, Vaud and St. Gallen.
This content was published on
Pierre-Yves Maillard, president of the Swiss Trade Union Confederation, sees no agreement in sight in negotiations with the European Union.
This content was published on
The "Dubai chocolate" has also caused a rush in Switzerland: queues formed outside the Lindt chocolate factory in Kilchberg, canton Zurich, on Saturday morning.
This content was published on
Stargazers currently have the chance to spot shooting stars in the night sky. Until November 30, the Leonid meteor shower is lighting up the darkness.
Nationalisation suggested to save Red Cross Museum
This content was published on
The director of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Museum in Geneva is calling for a national debate on the institution's future.
Climate: 224 Swiss companies announce CO2 reduction targets
This content was published on
A total of 224 companies from Switzerland have joined the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), committing to CO2 reduction targets that are in line with the Paris Climate Agreement.
Court finds Switzerland violated Sudanese man’s rights
This content was published on
In its verdict published on Tuesday, the Strasbourg-based court held that Switzerland’s decision to send the Sudanese national back home had violated articles two and three of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protect the right to life and prohibit torture and “inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment”. The Sudanese man has been a…
Switzerland criticised by Strasbourg court for judge’s lack of impartiality
This content was published on
The European Court of Human Rights has upheld an appeal by Erwin Sperisen, who had complained that the Geneva Appeals Court president was biased.
You can find an overview of ongoing debates with our journalists here . Please join us!
If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at english@swissinfo.ch.