People’s Party officials plan to appeal racism verdict
Martin Baltisser, leader of the conservative right People’s Party, and his deputy Silvia Bär say their decision to appeal is a struggle for freedom of expression
Keystone
Two top Swiss People’s Party officials found guilty of racial discrimination over an anti-immigration vote campaign say they plan to appeal the recent decision.
This content was published on
2 minutes
swissinfo.ch with agencies
Martin Baltisser, leader of the conservative right People’s Party, and his deputy Silvia Bär said on Friday they intend to appeal to Bern’s Supreme Court against a recent verdict of racial discrimination against the two for an advertising campaign featuring two Swiss attacked by knife-wielding immigrants from Kosovo.
The People’s Party campaign, with a slogan that read “Kosovars are cutting the Swiss apart!” and the true story of two Swiss attacked with knives in 2011, were released in the print media during the run-up to the February 9, 2014 vote and also appeared in 2011 on the party’s website.
On April 30 a Bern regional court said Baltisser and Bär had created a hostile attitude towards Kosovars through the advertisement. They were both given a conditional fine.
Baltisser told Swiss public radio, SRF, on Friday their decision to appeal was a struggle for freedom of expression: “It must be possible to present the things as they actually happened.”
The advertisement in question, which ran in Swiss newspapers, tells the story of two Swiss attacked by Kosovars with a knife under the headline “Kosovars are cutting Swiss apart!” The incident that the ad refers to occurred in 2011.
SRF online
In their defence the two officials claimed the party did not wish to put all Kosovars in the same basket but wanted to simply evoke the incident that occurred at Interlaken. The party did not intend to discriminate but wanted to simply denounce criminal acts, they said.
According to the anti-racism criminal law provisions of 1995, racial discrimination is a criminal offence (Article 261 of the Swiss penal code). Its prohibitions are explicit: incitements to hatred and discrimination; dissemination of discriminatory materials; denial or trivialisation of genocide and other crimes against humanity (eg. denial of the Holocaust); public discrimination.
Popular Stories
More
Life & Aging
Switzerland no longer wants to foot the bill for ‘suicide tourism’
As a Swiss Abroad, how do you feel about the emergence of more conservative family policies in some US states?
In recent years several US states have adopted more conservative policies on family issues, abortion and education. As a Swiss citizen living there, how do you view this development?
If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at english@swissinfo.ch.
Read more
More
People’s Party ad ruled discriminatory
This content was published on
The campaign, with a slogan that read “Kosovars are cutting the Swiss apart!” and the true story of two Swiss attacked with knives, were released in the print media during the run-up to the February 9, 2014 vote and also appeared in 2011 on the party’s website. On Thursday, a Bern regional court said People’s…
One in four Swiss residents has xenophobic attitudes
This content was published on
In a series of face-to-face interviews conducted between 2010 and 2014, gfs.bernExternal link researchers probed the mind-set of Swiss citizens and foreign residents, looking for systematic and repeated expressions of xenophobia. The overall trend of xenophobia showed a decline, from 30% harbouring negative opinions towards foreigners in 2010 to 24% in 2014. These were respondents…
People’s Party ad leads to legal action on EU quotas vote
This content was published on
An advertisement used during the campaign for a quota on EU immigrants last year has prompted legal action calling for the vote to be nullified and two Swiss People’s Party members being charged with racial discrimination.
This content was published on
According to criminal lawyer Marcel Niggli, the April 28 ruling reflects the correct interpretation of the 20-year-old anti-racism law. As the professor of criminal law and legal philosophy at the University of Fribourg told swissinfo.ch, the law should only apply to cases of extreme violation – as petty offences are more likely to lower the…
You can find an overview of ongoing debates with our journalists here . Please join us!
If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at english@swissinfo.ch.