Court decision sparks party debate on same-sex marriage
Some Christian Democrats now say it is out of date to define marriage as between a man and a woman.
Keystone
Many Christian Democrat politicians are no longer behind their party’s 2016 initiative on tax breaks for married couples because they see it as discriminatory towards gay couples, according to the Sonntagszeitung newspaper.
This content was published on
2 minutes
Keystone-SDA/jc
Español
es
Democratacristianos VS discriminación de parejas homosexuales
The paper says this week’s historic court decision annulling the result of a popular vote on that initiative has sparked a debate within the centrist party about same-sex marriage. A majority of its parliamentarians now reject the original text of the initiative, which defines marriage as a long-term and legally regulated relationship between a man and a woman.
Christian Democrat Senator Brigitte Häberli told the paper that this view of marriage is “out of date”, while even Senator Peter Hegglin from the party’s conservative wing said it is “no longer relevant” whether a marriage consists of a man and a woman.
If it comes to another vote, many politicians in the party want to make sure that the text of the initiative is changed, writes the paper.
The initiative “For marriage and family – against the marriage penalty” would have reduced the tax burden for married couples, who must file their taxes jointly rather than individually. This can mean a higher tax bill than they would have had as a cohabiting couple without the wedding rings.
It was narrowly defeated by 50.8% to 49.2% in early 2016 after an energetic “No” committee argued that the terms of the initiative would pose an obstacle for same-sex couples hoping to tie the knot someday.
But the Supreme Court this week annulled the result, ruling that the government had failed to provide correct information to voters on the proposal. Last year, the government admitted the misinformation, saying the number of couples that would be affected was wrongly reported. Instead of the 80,000 married and registered couples that were in line to benefit from reduced taxes, it was 454,000 couples.
More
More
Historic verdict could force Swiss re-vote on family tax breaks
This content was published on
The Supreme Court has annulled the result of a controversial vote about tax breaks for families – a first in the history of Swiss direct democracy.
Switzerland will deliver rubble removal equipment to Ukraine
This content was published on
Thirty rubble removal machines and thirty fire-fighting pumps: this is the equipment that Switzerland will be delivering to the Ukraine in the next few days. The total value of these goods is 5.6 million Swiss francs.
If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at english@swissinfo.ch.
Read more
More
Swiss papers welcome historic vote decision
This content was published on
Newspapers agree that, as a result of government misinformation, the Federal Court was right to annul the results of a vote on family tax breaks.
This content was published on
Switzerland should pave the way to allow same-sex couples to get married and adopt children, a parliamentary committee has said.
This content was published on
While fewer people got married last year in Switzerland, the number of same-sex couples forming registered partnerships has risen.
You can find an overview of ongoing debates with our journalists here . Please join us!
If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at english@swissinfo.ch.