Swiss perspectives in 10 languages

Public broadcaster deemed key for Swiss cohesion

Two young journalists in front of computer screens
Support for public broadcasters was particularly high among the young generation, but turnout among the 18-29-year old was comparatively low Keystone

Concern about the cohesion of multi-cultural Switzerland was the main reason for voters rejecting a proposal to do away with the mandatory public broadcasting licence fees last month.

The VotoExternal link study, which was published on Thursday, also found the rejection rate was the highest among 18-29-year old voters, despite speculation in the run-up to the March 4 ballot, that the “Netflix”-generation had no interest in a strong Swiss Broadcasting Corporation (SBC).

Nearly 72% of voters rejected the initiative by the youth wings of two major political parties on the right of the political spectrum.

About 60% of all poll respondents said licence fees were crucial for the survival of the SBC, which operates a broad range of television, radio and online channels, including swissinfo.ch.

“The vote was a clear endorsement for a public service of the Swiss Broadcasting Corporation, for a comprehensive offer in all language regions, strengthening the country’s cohesion and direct democracy,” says Anke Tresch of the Fors research institute at Lausanne University.

However, the pollster also found that 58% of respondents, particularly in the majority German-speaking part of the country, want the SBC to reduce spending and to downsize.

Debate to continue

It shows that the debate over the position of the SBC is not over, despite the clear vote result, according to Tresch.

The main reasons for backing the initiative were criticism of the programme offers and the amount of the licence fee – currently every household and company must pay an annual fee of CHF451.1 ($482) and CHF597.50 respectively to use the SBC’s offer.

The Voto studies are based on 1,531 telephone interviews with Swiss citizens living in all four language regions of the country. The Swiss expatriate community is not included in the polls.

Official, but incomplete results show that in most cantons, the proportion of ‘no’ votes from the Swiss Abroad was just under 78%.

Funded by the Federal Chancellery, Voto studies on nationwide ballots are carried out jointly by the Fors instituteExternal link of Lausanne University, the Centre for Democracy StudiesExternal link in Aarau and the Link market research instituteExternal link.

Popular Stories

Most Discussed

News

No Swiss bank in phase with environmental objectives

More

Swiss banks failing environment, says WWF

This content was published on None of the 15 major Swiss retail banks is meeting international climate and biodiversity targets, according to a ranking by WWF Switzerland.

Read more: Swiss banks failing environment, says WWF
UNRWA provides emergency assistance to just over one million Palestine refugees, or about 75 per cent of all Palestine refugees in Gaza, who lack the financial means to cover their basic food.

More

Lazzarini: no alternative to UNRWA in Gaza

This content was published on The only alternative to the UN Palestinian agency’s work in Gaza is to allow Israel to run services there, Philippe Lazzarini, UNRWA Commissioner-General, told reporters in Geneva on Monday.

Read more: Lazzarini: no alternative to UNRWA in Gaza

In compliance with the JTI standards

More: SWI swissinfo.ch certified by the Journalism Trust Initiative

You can find an overview of ongoing debates with our journalists here . Please join us!

If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at english@swissinfo.ch.

SWI swissinfo.ch - a branch of Swiss Broadcasting Corporation SRG SSR

SWI swissinfo.ch - a branch of Swiss Broadcasting Corporation SRG SSR