Switzerland’s Federal Court has upheld a ruling that the US ride-hailing firm should be treated as an employer, rejecting Uber’s attempt to overturn a Geneva court’s verdict.
This content was published on
2 minutes
Keystone-SDA/Reuters/sb
Português
pt
Tribunal superior suíço confirma condição de empregador da Uber
“According to the Federal Court, the cantonal court did not rule arbitrarily when it ruled that Uber drivers working in Geneva had an employment relationship with Uber BV. The Federal Court dismisses the corresponding appeal,” it said in a press releaseExternal link on Friday accompanying the verdict.
The Geneva cantonal authorities called it a “historic decision”, adding that it will serve as jurisprudence for all Swiss cantons.
Uber must now cease its operations in Geneva while it complies with the law, the Geneva authorities added. The case dates back to 2019 when the canton decided to classify Uber as an employer, hence obliging it to pay social benefits to its drivers to continue operating.
Reacting to Friday’s court decision, Uber said the ruling does not take into account the fact that “drivers do not want to be employed”. It confirmed that it has no option but to temporarily suspend its services in Geneva. The company intends to “resume contact with the authorities to find a solution acceptable to all”, adding that its activities in other cantons are not directly affected.
Legal cases
The ride-sharing app firm, which was founded in 2009, has caused certain controversy since its arrival in Switzerland in 2014. Several other similar Uber court decisions have been taken in other cantons, such as Zurich, Geneva and Vaud, relating to individual litigation, labour law and social security issues. Several other legal cases are pending.
The California-based company whose ride-sharing service has expanded worldwide stands accused in many countries of bypassing national labour protection standards and shunning collective negotiation with drivers who work on freelance terms.
In a separate ruling on food delivery service Uber Eats, the Federal Court on Friday upheld an appeal contesting whether the company was a recruitment service, as Geneva authorities had decided in 2019.
More
More
Zurich court rules Uber drivers are not ‘independent workers’
This content was published on
The rulingExternal link by the Zurich social insurance court, published on Thursday, says that the “marked subordination” in the relation between Uber and its drivers means that it is one of dependence between an employer and an employee. As such, Uber must pay social contributions for drivers, the court said: in this case – brought…
What factors should be taken into account when inheriting Swiss citizenship abroad?
Should there be a limit to the passing on of Swiss citizenship? Or is the current practice too strict and it should still be possible to register after the age of 25?
Is your place of origin, your Heimatort, important to you?
Every Swiss citizen has a Heimatort, a place of origin, but many have never visited theirs. What’s your relationship with your Heimatort? What does it mean to you?
This content was published on
Scientists have shown that bonobos combine their calls into complex sound sequences that resemble combinations of human words.
This content was published on
US parliamentarians have threatened the UN Human Rights Council with sanctions similar to those against the International Criminal Court (ICC).
This content was published on
Thanks to abundant snowfall, lift operators benefited from increased visitor numbers, with the number of guests jumping by 12% year-on-year.
If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at english@swissinfo.ch.
Read more
More
Zurich court rules Uber drivers are not ‘independent workers’
This content was published on
The rulingExternal link by the Zurich social insurance court, published on Thursday, says that the “marked subordination” in the relation between Uber and its drivers means that it is one of dependence between an employer and an employee. As such, Uber must pay social contributions for drivers, the court said: in this case – brought…
This content was published on
A cantonal court says a former Uber driver was an employee of the ride-sharing firm and that he had wrongly lost his job.
This content was published on
The global tech giant Uber is fighting multiple legal battles against being classified as an employer of any kind – with all the obligations and rights that would entail. Several court decisions are pending in Switzerland. SRF’s consumer magazine Espresso has brought to light the latest, yet unpublished, judgement dealing with the issue. In early…
Uber faces ban in Geneva if it fails to hire drivers
This content was published on
The Swiss canton of Geneva has decided to classify Uber as an employer, hence obliging it to pay social benefits to its drivers to continue operating.
You can find an overview of ongoing debates with our journalists here . Please join us!
If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at english@swissinfo.ch.